From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Alight Sols.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 14, 2022
Civil Action 21-1855 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-1855

12-14-2022

BRUCE L. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. ALIGHT SOLUTIONS, LLC and EXELON CORPORATION, Defendants.


ORDER

EDWARD G. SMITH, J.

AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2022, after considering the “Motion to Enter and Enforce FRCP Rule #55(b)(1) Default Judgement [sic] Against the Co-Defendants” (Doc. No. 57) and “Required Motion to Enter and Enforce FCP Rule #55(b)(1) Default Judgement [sic] Against the Co-Defendants” (Doc. No. 65) filed by the pro se plaintiff, Bruce L. Clark; and after considering the defendants' response to one of the plaintiff's default judgment motions (Doc. No. 59); and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's two motions seeking default judgment (Doc. Nos. 57, 65) are DENIED.


Summaries of

Clark v. Alight Sols.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 14, 2022
Civil Action 21-1855 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Clark v. Alight Sols.

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE L. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. ALIGHT SOLUTIONS, LLC and EXELON…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-1855 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 14, 2022)