Clark v. Alight Sols.

Full title: BRUCE L. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. ALIGHT SOLUTIONS, LLC, and EXELON…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

5:21-cv-01855 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

5:21-cv-01855

03-11-2022

BRUCE L. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. ALIGHT SOLUTIONS, LLC, and EXELON CORPORATION Defendants.

JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge

ORDER

JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 11^th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, ECF No. 44, Plaintiff's response, ECF No. 46, and for the reasons given in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 44, is granted.

2. Plaintiff's amended complaint, ECF No. 40, is dismissed with prejudice.¹

1 The Court dismisses Plaintiff's Amended Complaint with prejudice because he had an opportunity to cure his claim's deficiencies but did not. Any additional amendments would therefore be futile. See Boyd v. New Jersey Dept. of Corrections, 583 Fed.Appx. 30, 32 (3d Cir. 2014).

3. This case is closed.