Clark v. Alight Sols.

Full title: BRUCE L. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. ALIGHT SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

5:21-cv-01855 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

5:21-cv-01855

01-05-2022

BRUCE L. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. ALIGHT SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant.

JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge

ORDER

JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 5^th day of January, 2022, since the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this case, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Complaint, ECF No. 1, is dismissed without prejudice.

2. Each pending motion, ECF Nos. 24, 27, 29, and 31, is dismissed.

3. Plaintiff has 21 days from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint if he wishes.^{[ 1}

1 As explained in the Court's Opinion, Plaintiff should only file an Amended Complaint if he can sufficiently allege both that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction and why the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not prohibit the Court from reviewing the Amended Complaint.

BY THE COURT: