From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Albert

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 20, 2022
5:21-cv-04096-JDW (E.D. Pa. Sep. 20, 2022)

Opinion

5:21-cv-04096-JDW

09-20-2022

SHELBY TYRONE CLARK, JR., Plaintiff, v. LT. BROOKE ALBERT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J.

AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2022, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To Take Additional Discovery (ECF No. 44) is DENIED;
2. Defendant Kyle Russell's Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 39) is GRANTED, and summary judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Kyle Russell and against Plaintiff Shelby Tyrone Clark on all of Mr. Clark's claims;
3. Plaintiff's Motion For Injunctive Relief And Damages (ECF Nos. 37 and 43) are DENIED; and
4. Plaintiff's Motion For Corrections To Plaintiff's Motion For Injunctive Relief And Damages (ECF No. 45) is DENIED AS MOOT.

The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Clark v. Albert

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 20, 2022
5:21-cv-04096-JDW (E.D. Pa. Sep. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Clark v. Albert

Case Details

Full title:SHELBY TYRONE CLARK, JR., Plaintiff, v. LT. BROOKE ALBERT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 20, 2022

Citations

5:21-cv-04096-JDW (E.D. Pa. Sep. 20, 2022)