From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Airco of St. Lucie, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 15, 1967
195 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 35667.

February 15, 1967.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Fee, Parker Neill, Fort Pierce, for petitioner.

Jones, Adams, Paine Foster, West Palm Beach, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 27, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney's fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clark v. Airco of St. Lucie, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 15, 1967
195 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

Clark v. Airco of St. Lucie, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR CLYDE CLARK, PETITIONER, v. AIRCO OF ST. LUCIE, INC., BITUMINOUS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 15, 1967

Citations

195 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1967)