From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1994
209 A.D.2d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 21, 1994

Appeal from the Court of Claims (Benza, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Upon our in camera review of the requested document, we find that the Court of Claims properly determined that the inter-agency report of the Department of Transportation is irrelevant to the subject matter of the claim and privileged under CPLR 3101 (b) (see, Cirale v. 80 Pine St. Corp., 35 N.Y.2d 113, 117-118; Matter of Schwartz, 130 Misc.2d 786; see also, Public Officers Law § 87 [g]; O'Shaughnessy v. New York State Div. of State Police, 202 A.D.2d 508; Matter of Rome Sentinel Co. v. City of Rome, 174 A.D.2d 1005, 1006; Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v. Williams, 134 A.D.2d 267). Thompson, J.P., Miller, O'Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1994
209 A.D.2d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLARK-FITZPATRICK, INC., Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 647

Citing Cases

Robinson v. State

The Court does find, however, that some portions of Document II, the affidavit of Lucien Leclaire, have some…

Robinson v. State

The privilege is cast in terms of a demand for information by a member of the public under the Freedom of…