Opinion
No. 67715
05-20-2015
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Having considered this original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion for partial summary judgment, we conclude that petitioner has not met its burden of demonstrating that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is warranted as petitioner has an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from any adverse final judgment. NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P. 3d 840, 841 (2004) (holding that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief); see also NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly we,
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge
Kolesar & Leatham, Chtd.
Gordon Silver
Eighth District Court Clerk