stating that one justification for tolling the period for filing charges with the EEOC would be if the EEOC misled the plaintiff
Summary of this case from Nowlin v. Resolution Trust Corp.No. 88-725.
January 9, 1989.
C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 851 F. 2d 478.
stating that one justification for tolling the period for filing charges with the EEOC would be if the EEOC misled the plaintiff
Summary of this case from Nowlin v. Resolution Trust Corp.Full title:CLAMP-ALL CORP. v. CAST IRON SOIL PIPE INSTITUTE ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 9, 1989
Louisiana has no state agency for age discrimination complaints and is therefore not a deferral state. See…
Wynn v. MorganO'Brien v. City of Grand Rapids, 23 F.3d at 999. Resolution of the qualified immunity issue is a question of…