From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Ciprian v. Barbizon Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 29, 2003
305 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92210

May 29, 2003.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed September 12, 2001, which found that claimant has a marked permanent partial disability.

Vecchione, Vecchione Connors, Williston Park (Michael F. Vecchione of counsel), for appellants.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Iris A. Steel of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Claimant, a hotel housekeeper, sustained a work-related back injury on May 4, 1996 when a stack of towels and a towel rack fell on her. At issue on appeal is the determination of the Workers' Compensation Board that claimant has a marked permanent partial disability causally related to this injury. The employer and its workers' compensation carrier argue that the Board's decision is not supported by substantial evidence inasmuch as it rests on the allegedly speculative opinions of claimant's medical experts, and further that the Board substituted its judgment for that of the medical experts when it concluded, in the absence of medical testimony, that claimant is permanently disabled. We disagree.

The Board based its determination on the testimony of claimant's treating orthopedist and chiropractor who opined that claimant has a marked partial disability, as well as the reports of claimant's neurologist indicating that claimant's disability is permanent. Although the carrier's medical expert opined that claimant is no longer disabled as a result of the 1996 injury, the Board is empowered to resolve conflicts in the medical testimony, and its resolution must be accorded deference (see Matter of Kramer v. Ultra Blend Corp., 297 A.D.2d 890, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 506; Matter of Estate of Matusko v. Kennedy Valve Mfg. Co., 296 A.D.2d 726, 728, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 504). Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant has a marked permanent partial disability.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Claim of Ciprian v. Barbizon Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 29, 2003
305 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Claim of Ciprian v. Barbizon Hotel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of AIDA CIPRIAN, Respondent, v. BARBIZON HOTEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 29, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 261