From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claiborne v. Gujral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 21, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV289 (E.D. Va. Jun. 21, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:17CV289

06-21-2017

TYEL LASHAWN CLAIBORNE, Plaintiff, v. INDER JEET SINGH GUJRAL, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on May 10, 2017, the Court conditionally docketed the action. At that time, the Court directed Tyel Lashawn Claiborne to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Claiborne that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Claiborne has not complied with the order of this Court. Claiborne failed to return the consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Claiborne.

/s/_________

Robert E. Payne

Senior United States District Judge Date: June 21, 2017
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Claiborne v. Gujral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 21, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV289 (E.D. Va. Jun. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Claiborne v. Gujral

Case Details

Full title:TYEL LASHAWN CLAIBORNE, Plaintiff, v. INDER JEET SINGH GUJRAL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jun 21, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:17CV289 (E.D. Va. Jun. 21, 2017)