From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claiborne v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 20, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0596 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0596 FCD DAD P.

February 20, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the Board of Parole Hearings' 2004 decision to deny him parole. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's application.

In his petition, petitioner also requests the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's application within thirty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

2. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of an answer;

3. If the response to petitioner's application is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed within fifteen days thereafter; and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.

5. Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Claiborne v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 20, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0596 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Claiborne v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN CLAIBORNE, Petitioner, v. TOM L. CAREY, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 20, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0596 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)