Clackamas Cnty. v. Medley

Full title: CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON, Plaintiff, v. RON E. MEDLEY, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 3, 2014

3:13-CV-01968-HU (D. Or. Mar. 3, 2014)

Opinion

3:13-CV-01968-HU

03-03-2014

CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON, Plaintiff, v. RON E. MEDLEY, Defendant.

ANNA J. BROWN

ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Dennis James Hubel issued Findings and Recommendation (#7) on December 9, 2013, in which he recommends the Court sua sponte remand this matter to Clackamas County Justice Court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Defendant filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9^th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9 Cir. 2003)(en banc).

th

This Court has carefully considered Defendant's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation (#7) and, therefore, REMANDS this matter to Clackamas County Justice Court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge