From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cives Steel Company v. Unit Builders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 17, 1999
262 A.D.2d 164 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 17, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.).


The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiff leave to serve defendant Unit, a defunct corporation, by serving its insurer. Service upon the Secretary of State was not feasible in light of Unit's voluntary dissolution some three years prior to the, institution of the action against it, and plaintiff was unable to locate a corporate officer who could be served. Under the circumstances, service upon the insurer was the only apparent method reasonably calculated to apprise Unit of the pendency of the action against it ( see, Bossuk v. Steinberg, 58 N.Y.2d 916, 918-919).

Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.


Summaries of

Cives Steel Company v. Unit Builders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 17, 1999
262 A.D.2d 164 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Cives Steel Company v. Unit Builders

Case Details

Full title:CIVES STEEL COMPANY, Respondent, v. UNIT BUILDERS, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 164 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 65

Citing Cases

Germain v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co.

See Plaintiff's June 12, 2013 Memorandum of Law, p. 8. Cives Steel Co. v Unit Builders, Inc., 262 AD2d 164 (1…

Germain v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co.

See Plaintiff's June 12, 2013 Memorandum of Law, p. 8. Cives Steel Co. v Unit Builders, Inc., 262 AD2d 164…