From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City Textile Printing Corp. v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1966
27 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

December 13, 1966


Determination of the Appellate Term to the extent appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the order and judgment of the Civil Court, insofar as the same grant summary judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant Sol Rosenberg, reinstated, with costs and disbursements to plaintiff in all courts. The deadline for obtaining the mortgage commitment was missed by so short a time that the vendor's disappointment is understandable. But the suspicion that plaintiff was responsible for the delay in securing the commitment has no foundation other than surmise and speculation, as we read the affidavits. The facts set forth raise no genuine issue either of bad faith, fraud or lack of diligence.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

City Textile Printing Corp. v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1966
27 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

City Textile Printing Corp. v. Rosenberg

Case Details

Full title:CITY TEXTILE PRINTING CORP., Appellant, v. SOL ROSENBERG, Respondent, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1966

Citations

27 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)