Opinion
2:22-cv-01841-HL
06-15-2023
CITY OF UMATILLA, OREGON, Plaintiff, v. JOEY CHACON, Defendant.
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Magistrate Judge Hallman issued a Findings and Recommendation on May 15, 2023, in which he recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. F&R, ECF 11. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Hallman’s Findings and Recommendation [11].
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [8] is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the following amounts: (1) $157,197.10 in damages; (2)$ 5662.50 in attorney’s fees; and (3) $171.50 in costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.