From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Tuskegee v. Lacey

Supreme Court of Alabama
Sep 15, 1989
551 So. 2d 338 (Ala. 1989)

Opinion

87-1488.

September 15, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Macon County, No. CV-84-18, James Avary, Judge.

Fred D. Gray and Walter E. McGowan of Gray, Langford, Sapp McGowan, Tuskegee, for appellants.

Ira De Ment and Roianne Houlton Frith, Montgomery, for appellees.


The trial court's final judgment in this cause, declaring the City of Tuskegee's annexation ordinances 84-1, 84-2, and 86-23 invalid on the authority of City of Fultondale v. City of Birmingham, 507 So.2d 489 (Ala. 1987), is affirmed. For the retroactive application of City of Fultondale, see City of Birmingham v. Blount County, 533 So.2d 534, 537 (Ala. 1988). See, also, City of Birmingham v. Smith, 507 So.2d 1312 (Ala. 1987).

The jurisdiction of the trial court to adjudicate all matters relating to the terms and conditions of its order of stay pending appeal is not affected by this Court's judgment of affirmance.

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, JONES, ALMON, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

City of Tuskegee v. Lacey

Supreme Court of Alabama
Sep 15, 1989
551 So. 2d 338 (Ala. 1989)
Case details for

City of Tuskegee v. Lacey

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF TUSKEGEE, et al. v. Andrew J. LACEY, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Sep 15, 1989

Citations

551 So. 2d 338 (Ala. 1989)