From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of St. Louis v. Burnett

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Nov 24, 2015
477 S.W.3d 175 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102447

11-24-2015

City of St. Louis, Respondent, v. Tyris Burnett, Appellant.

Stephen Michael Ryals, The Ryals Law Firm, P.O. Box 11065, Ferguson, MO 63135, Attorney for Appellant. Rory Patrick O'Sullivan, J. Brent Dulle, Co–Counsel, 1200 Market Street, Room 314, St. Louis, MO 63103, Attorneys for Respondent.


Stephen Michael Ryals, The Ryals Law Firm, P.O. Box 11065, Ferguson, MO 63135, Attorney for Appellant.

Rory Patrick O'Sullivan, J. Brent Dulle, Co–Counsel, 1200 Market Street, Room 314, St. Louis, MO 63103, Attorneys for Respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

In this consolidated appeal, Tyris Burnett (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the circuit court finding Appellant guilty of interfering with a police officer and resisting arrest, in violation of Section 15.10.010 of the Revised Code of the City of St. Louis. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

City of St. Louis v. Burnett

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Nov 24, 2015
477 S.W.3d 175 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

City of St. Louis v. Burnett

Case Details

Full title:City of St. Louis, Respondent, v. Tyris Burnett, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Nov 24, 2015

Citations

477 S.W.3d 175 (E.D. Mo. 2015)