From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Shelton v. the Connecticut Light Power Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 27, 1965
209 A.2d 189 (Conn. 1965)

Opinion

Walter F. Torrance, Jr., for the defendant appellee The Connecticut Light and Power Company, and Samuel Kanell, assistant attorney general, for the defendant appellee the public utilities commission, in support of the motion. Leo Vine, corporation counsel, for the plaintiff appellant city of Shelton, and David M. Shea, for the plaintiff appellant The B. F. Goodrich Company, on the motion.

Submitted April 8, 1965

Decided April 27, 1965


In the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County, the motion by the parties that the above-entitled cases be assigned for hearing on the same date, that the appellees be permitted to file a single brief in the two cases and that the time for filing the appellees' brief be determined by the filing date of the appellant's brief in the second case is granted to the extent that (1) the parties in the above-entitled cases may be permitted, at the time of assignment, to request a hearing on the same date and (2) the appellees may file a single brief in both cases. The motion in all other respects is denied.


Summaries of

City of Shelton v. the Connecticut Light Power Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 27, 1965
209 A.2d 189 (Conn. 1965)
Case details for

City of Shelton v. the Connecticut Light Power Co.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF SHELTON v. THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY ET AL. THE B…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Apr 27, 1965

Citations

209 A.2d 189 (Conn. 1965)
209 A.2d 189

Citing Cases

Waldmann v. Skrainka Const. Co.

R.S. 1919, sec. 1513; Freeland v. Williamson, 220 Mo. 217, 229; Mann v. Doerr, 222 Mo. 1, 15; Moore v. L. Ry.…

Milligan v. Light Power Co.

Van Bibber v. Swift Co., 228 S.W. 75; Flack v. Santa Fe, 285 Mo. 48. (c) Deceased assumed the risks incident…