City of South Euclid v. Datillo

11 Citing cases

  1. State v. Kirby

    2024 Ohio 1582 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)

    Cleveland v. Wanton, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109828, 2021-Ohio-1951, ¶ 8, citing Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219, 450 N.E.2d 1140 (1983). "'An abuse of discretion also occurs when a trial court "'applies the wrong legal standard, misapplies the correct legal standard, or relies on clearly erroneous findings of fact.'"'" State v. Nix, II, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 111803, 2023-Ohio-1143, ¶ 10, quoting State v. Walton, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 87347, 2006-Ohio-47718, quoting S. Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 8 (8th Dist.), quoting Thomas v. Cleveland, 176 Ohio App.3d 401, 2008-Ohio-1720, 892 N.E.2d 454, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.).

  2. Hawken Sch. v. Machado

    2024 Ohio 1060 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)

    "An abuse of discretion also occurs when a court '"applies the wrong legal standard, misapplies the correct legal standard, or relies on clearly erroneous findings of fact."'" Cleveland v. Wanton, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109828, 2021-Ohio-1951, ¶ 8, quoting S. Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 8 (8th Dist.), quoting Thomas v. Cleveland, 176 Ohio App.3d 401, 2008-Ohio-1720, 892 N.E.2d 454, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.). {¶18} Civ.R. 56(E) sets forth the requirements for affidavits submitted on summary judgment and provides, in relevant part:

  3. State v. Cruz

    2024 Ohio 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)

    Id. at ¶ 20, quoting State v. Hackett, 164 Ohio St.3d 74, 2020-Ohio-6699, 172 N.E.3d 75, ¶ 19. Additionally, a court abuses its discretion when it "'applies the wrong legal standard, misapplies the correct legal standard, or relies on clearly erroneous findings of fact.'" S. Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 8 (8th Dist.), quoting Thomas v. Cleveland, 176 Ohio App.3d 401, 2008-Ohio-1720, 892 N.E.2d 454, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.); State v Nix, II, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 111803, 2023-Ohio-1143, ¶ 10.

  4. State v. McAlpin

    2023 Ohio 4794 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)

    "An abuse of discretion also occurs when a court '"applies the wrong legal standard, misapplies the correct legal standard, or relies on clearly erroneous findings of fact."'" Cleveland v. Wanton, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109828, 2021-Ohio-1951, ¶ 8, quoting S. Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 8 (8th Dist.), quoting Thomas v. Cleveland, 176 Ohio App.3d 401, 2008-Ohio-1720, 892 N.E.2d 454, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.).

  5. State v. Newberry

    2023 Ohio 3623 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)

    "An abuse of discretion also occurs when a court '"applies the wrong legal standard, misapplies the correct legal standard, or relies on clearly erroneous findings of fact."'" Cleveland v. Wanton, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109828, 2021- Ohio-1951, ¶ 8, quoting S. Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 8 (8th Dist), quoting Thomas v. Cleveland, 176 Ohio App.3d 401, 2008-Ohio-1720, 892 N.E.2d 454, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.).

  6. City of Rocky River v. Landers

    2023 Ohio 2962 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)

    A conflict between a statute and an ordinance can be a direct conflict or a "conflict by implication," i.e., where an '"ordinance will indirectly prohibit what a state statute permits or vice versa."' South Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.), quoting Mendenhall v. Akron, 117 Ohio St.3d 33, 2008-Ohio-270, 881 N.E.2d 255, ¶ 31; see also Ohioans for Concealed Carry, 2017-Ohio-1560, 90 N.E.3d 80, at ¶ 10 ("Courts also have applied a 'conflict-by-implication' test and held that local ordinances that attempt to impose restrictions beyond what the general state law permits are invalid."), citing Am. Fin. Servs. Assn. v. Cleveland, 112 Ohio St.3d 170, 2006-Ohio-6043, 858 N.E.2d 776, ¶ 46 (concluding that "any local ordinances that seek to prohibit conduct that the state has authorized are in conflict with the state statutes and are therefore unconstitutional").

  7. State v. Ali

    2023 Ohio 2587 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)

    "An abuse of discretion also occurs when a court '"applies the wrong legal standard, misapplies the correct legal standard, or relies on clearly erroneous findings of fact."'" Cleveland v. Wanton, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109828, 2021-Ohio-1951, ¶ 8, quoting S. Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 8 (8th Dist.), quoting Thomas v. Cleveland, 176 Ohio App.3d 401, 2008-Ohio-1720, 892 N.E.2d 454, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.).

  8. State v. Riley

    2023 Ohio 2588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)

    "An abuse of discretion also occurs when a court '"applies the wrong legal standard, misapplies the correct legal standard, or relies on clearly erroneous findings of fact."'" Cleveland v. Wanton, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109828, 2021-Ohio-1951, ¶ 8, quoting S. Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 8 (8th Dist.), quoting Thomas v. Cleveland, 176 Ohio App.3d 401, 2008-Ohio-1720, 892 N.E.2d 454, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.). {¶ 36} In reviewing the trial court's denial of Riley's application, we are mindful that "the relevant question is not whether the available admissible evidence was enough to convict [the offender]" at trial.

  9. Avalon Test Equip. Leasing v. Emerald Design & Constr.

    2023 Ohio 1375 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)

    See, e.g., State v. Musleh, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 105305, 2017-Ohio-8166, ¶ 36, citing Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219, 450 N.E.2d 1140 (1983). "An abuse of discretion also occurs when a court '"applies the wrong legal standard, misapplies the correct legal standard, or relies on clearly erroneous findings of fact."'" Cleveland v. Wanton, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109828, 2021-Ohio-1951, ¶ 8, quoting S. Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 8 (8th Dist.), quoting Thomas v. Cleveland, 176 Ohio App.3d 401, 2008-Ohio-1720, 892 N.E.2d 454, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.). {¶17} Civ.R. 55(A) provides that "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules, the party entitled to a judgment by default shall apply in writing or orally to the court therefor" and that a default judgment may then be entered against the defaulting party (provided certain conditions are met).

  10. State v. Nix

    2023 Ohio 1143 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)

    "An abuse of discretion also occurs when a trial court '"applies the wrong legal standard, misapplies the correct legal standard, or relies on clearly erroneous findings of fact.'"" Wanton at ¶ 8, quoting S. Euclid v. Datillo, 2020-Ohio-4999, 160 N.E.3d 813, ¶ 8 (8th Dist.), quoting Thomas v. Cleveland, 176 Ohio App.3d 401, 2008-Ohio-1720, 892 N.E.2d 454, ¶ 15 (8th Dist.).