From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Russellville v. Citizens' Bank Savings Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 20, 1922
92 So. 469 (Ala. 1922)

Opinion

8 Div. 449.

April 20, 1922.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Franklin County; C. P. Almon, Judge.

Travis Williams, of Russellville, for appellant.

The city had ample authority to enact the ordinance, and it is not in conflict with any state law, nor is it unreasonable nor confiscatory. Sections 1276, 1282, and 1290, Code 1907.

William L. Chenault, of Russellville, for appellees.

The ordinance was void, because there is no authority for its enactment. 142 Ala. 552, 38 So. 67, 70 L.R.A. 209, 110 Am. St. Rep. 43; 56 Fla. 422, 47 So. 963, 21 L.R.A. (N.S.) 192; 58 S.W. 795, 22 Ky. Law Rep. 806, 51 L.R.A. 897.


Appellees were prosecuted in the recorder's court of the city of Russellville for failing, after notice, to pay a certain tax levied by the municipal authorities under an ordinance providing for the disposition of trash, garbage, and night soil. To provide for the expenses of collection and removal, a special graduated tax is imposed upon all persons, firms, and corporations within the limits of the city. On appeal the circuit court seems to have ruled that the ordinance was without the power of the municipal authorities.

We are loath to decide a question of this moment upon the meager arguments presented. However, the general principle is that every municipal corporation which demands taxes from the people, must be able to show due authority from the state to make the demand. 2 Cooley, Taxation, 1293. And no authority to tax for special and unusual purposes can be inferred from a general grant. 1 Cooley, Taxation, 469. We are referred to section 1282 of the Code, among others less relevant, as authority for the tax here at issue. But that section provides for the establishment and maintenance of crematories and the haulage to them of trash and garbage. The city of Russellville maintains no crematories. We therefore are of opinion that the circuit court was right in its judgment. We will not, of course, be understood as doubting for a moment the power and duty of municipal corporations under the Code to maintain the health and cleanliness of their territories, and to that end provide proper ordinances. The question here relates only to the source from which such regulations may be financed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

City of Russellville v. Citizens' Bank Savings Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 20, 1922
92 So. 469 (Ala. 1922)
Case details for

City of Russellville v. Citizens' Bank Savings Co.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF RUSSELLVILLE v. CITIZENS' BANK SAVINGS CO. et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 20, 1922

Citations

92 So. 469 (Ala. 1922)
92 So. 469

Citing Cases

Martin v. City of Trussville

See: City of Lake Charles v. Wallace, 247 La. 285, 170 So.2d 654 (1964). Martin relies primarily upon the…