Opinion
1220 CA 16-00089
02-03-2017
IN THE MATTER OF CITY OF ROME, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS AND/OR ASSESSOR OF TOWN OF LEWIS, BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW, COUNTY OF LEWIS, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
C. LOUIS ABELOVE, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS BOARD OF ASSESSORS AND/OR ASSESSOR OF TOWN OF LEWIS, AND BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW. JOAN E. MCNICHOL, COUNTY ATTORNEY, LOWVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT COUNTY OF LEWIS. GOLDMAN ATTORNEYS PLLC, ALBANY (PAUL J. GOLDMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT:
C. LOUIS ABELOVE, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS BOARD OF ASSESSORS AND/OR ASSESSOR OF TOWN OF LEWIS, AND BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW.
JOAN E. MCNICHOL, COUNTY ATTORNEY, LOWVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT COUNTY OF LEWIS.
GOLDMAN ATTORNEYS PLLC, ALBANY (PAUL J. GOLDMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Lewis County (Charles C. Merrell, J.), entered August 27, 2015. The order, inter alia, granted the motion of petitioner for partial summary judgment on the ground of selective reassessment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of City of Rome v Board of Assessors and/or Assessor of Town of Lewis ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 3, 2017]).
Entered: February 3, 2017
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court