From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 27, 2012
No. 2005 C.D. 2010 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Apr. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1987 C.D. 2010 No. 1988 C.D. 2010 No. 1989 C.D. 2010 No. 1990 C.D. 2010 No. 1991 C.D. 2010 No. 1992 C.D. 2010 No. 1993 C.D. 2010 No. 1994 C.D. 2010 No. 1995 C.D. 2010 No. 1996 C.D. 2010 No. 1997 C.D. 2010 No. 1998 C.D. 2010 No. 1999 C.D. 2010 No. 2000 C.D. 2010 No. 2001 C.D. 2010 No. 2002 C.D. 2010 No. 2003 C.D. 2010 No. 2004 C.D. 2010 No. 2005 C.D. 2010

04-27-2012

City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Campbell), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (McHugh), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Trenz), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Mobley), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Jarzynka), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Shuster), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Marks), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Lennon-Spangler), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kuczyinski), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ungerman), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Fouch), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Glaze), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Howard), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Moran), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Dayton), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Divosevic), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ruckel), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Buckley), Respondent City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Belajac), Respondent


ORDER

NOW, April 27, 2012, having considered petitioners' protective application for reargument en banc and respondents' answer, the application is denied.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

DAN PELLEGRINI,

President Judge


Summaries of

City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 27, 2012
No. 2005 C.D. 2010 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Apr. 27, 2012)
Case details for

City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

Case Details

Full title:City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Work Partners CLMS MGM, Petitioners v…

Court:COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

No. 2005 C.D. 2010 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Apr. 27, 2012)