Opinion
2:11 -CV-01808-GEB-GGH
08-11-2011
Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson Deborah J. Fox Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Palmdale OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Deputy Attorney General Amy J. Winn Attorneys for State Defendants
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
WILLIAM L. CARTER, State Bar No. 59215
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
AMY J. WINN, State Bar No. 142421
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys fordefendants the California High-Speed
Rail Authority and Roelof van Ark, Chief Executive
Officer of the California High-Speed Rail Authority
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Local Rules 143 and 144
Trial Date N/A
Originally filed in the United States District
Court for the Central District of California,
Case No. LACV11-5545 R (MANx)/Transfer
The parties to the above matter, through their attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS the Court sua sponte requested briefing via an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") on subject matter jurisdiction by order dated August 2, 2011 and the hearing on this OSC is scheduled for August 29, 2011;
WHEREAS the parties had earlier stipulated on July 18, 2001 and without leave of court to extend the time for defendants to respond to the Complaint to August 26, 2011;
WHEREAS the parties believe it would serve the best interests of the parties and the court to extend the time for defendants to respond to the Complaint until after the Court has ruled with respect to the OSC referenced above;
THEREFORE, it is stipulated and agreed that defendants shall have two weeks from the date the Court rules on the question of subject matter jurisdiction to file responses to the Complaint.
Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson
Deborah J. Fox
Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Palmdale
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Deputy Attorney General Amy J. Winn
Attorneys for State Defendants
IT IS SO ORDERED.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge