City of Orlando v. Haynes

Full title: CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellant, v. CARLUS L. HAYNES AND CARLOS M. ROMERO…

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 5, 2019

263 So. 3d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-953

02-05-2019

CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellant, v. Carlus L. HAYNES and Carlos M. Romero, Appellees.

Derek J. Angell, of O'Connor & O'Connor, LLC, Orlando, for Appellant. Carlus L. Haynes, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, pro se, and Bradley N. Laurent, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee. No Appearance for Appellee, Carlos M. Romero.

PER CURIAM.

Derek J. Angell, of O'Connor & O'Connor, LLC, Orlando, for Appellant.

Carlus L. Haynes, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, pro se, and Bradley N. Laurent, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

No Appearance for Appellee, Carlos M. Romero.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hayes v. State, 94 So.3d 452, 461 (Fla. 2012) ("[T]he proper remedy when the trial court fails to abide by its duty under the Melbourne[ v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996) ] procedure is to reverse and remand for a new trial.").

EVANDER, C.J. and GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.