holding that the Limitation of Liability Act does not create independent jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Summary of this case from In Matter of FieldsNo. 90-1763.
October 7, 1991, October TERM, 1991.
C.A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 922 F. 2d 465.
holding that the Limitation of Liability Act does not create independent jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Summary of this case from In Matter of Fieldsfinding full and fair consideration requires consideration by the trial court and the availability of meaningful appellate review by the higher state court
Summary of this case from Sheffield v. Sec'y, DOCdiscussing evidentiary hearing issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2254; collecting cases under both § 2254 and § 2255
Summary of this case from Brown v. U.S.discussing the Strickland test, presumed prejudice, and Batson
Summary of this case from Dobyne v. StateFull title:CITY OF OMAHA ET AL. v. BUFFKINS
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 7, 1991
In Lee v. State, 631 So.2d 1059 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), and Locke v. State, 631 So.2d 1062 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993),…
Drinkard v. StateLee v. State, 631 So.2d 1059, 1060 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), and Locke v. State, 631 So.2d 1062 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993).…