From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 20, 2021
993 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2021)

Summary

noting that its use of “Latino” is “also meant to include persons who identify as ‘Latina,' ‘Latinx,' or “Hispanic'”

Summary of this case from Wolfe v. Columbia Coll., Inc.

Opinion

No. 19-15169

04-20-2021

CITY OF OAKLAND, A Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellants.


ORDER

:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judges Christen, Watford, Owens, Friedland, Bennett, and Collins did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 20, 2021
993 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2021)

noting that its use of “Latino” is “also meant to include persons who identify as ‘Latina,' ‘Latinx,' or “Hispanic'”

Summary of this case from Wolfe v. Columbia Coll., Inc.
Case details for

City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF OAKLAND, A Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WELLS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 20, 2021

Citations

993 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2021)

Citing Cases

Wolfe v. Columbia Coll., Inc.

The Court thus adopts Plaintiff Wolfe's use of this term, recognizing it to be generally synonymous with…

Prince George's Cnty. v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Following the issuance of the panel's decision, the Ninth Circuit voted to rehear City of Oakland en banc.…