From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coppola Constr. Co. v. Hoffman Enters. Ltd. P'ship

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 17, 2012
304 Conn. 923 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-17

COPPOLA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. HOFFMAN ENTERPRISES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al.

Richard P. Weinstein, West Hartford, and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition. Fletcher C. Thomson, Hartford, in opposition.


Richard P. Weinstein, West Hartford, and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition. Fletcher C. Thomson, Hartford, in opposition.

The petition by the defendant Jeffrey S. Hoffman for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 203, 38 A.3d 215, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had stated a legally sufficient claim for negligent misrepresentation?”

PALMER and McLACHLAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Coppola Constr. Co. v. Hoffman Enters. Ltd. P'ship

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 17, 2012
304 Conn. 923 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

Coppola Constr. Co. v. Hoffman Enters. Ltd. P'ship

Case Details

Full title:COPPOLA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. HOFFMAN ENTERPRISES LIMITED…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Apr 17, 2012

Citations

304 Conn. 923 (Conn. 2012)
41 A.3d 663

Citing Cases

Stuart v. Freiberg

(Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Coppola Construction Co. v. Hoffman Enterprises Ltd.…

Gates v. Cartwright

" [W]hat is necessarily implied [in an allegation] need not be expressly alleged." Coppola Construction Co.…