From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Norfolk v. Oast

Supreme Court of Virginia
Apr 28, 1949
53 S.E.2d 137 (Va. 1949)

Opinion

38857

April 28, 1949

Williams, Cocke Tunstall, for the petitioner.

James G. Martin, James N. Garrett, Major M. Hillard, A. O. Lynch, W. R. Ashburn, Paul W. Ackiss, Richard B. Kellam, Jerry G. Bray, Jr. and Tazewell Taylor, amici curiae.


Upon a petition for a writ of prohibition, petition dismissed.


This day came again the parties, by counsel, and the court, having maturely considered the petition of the petitioner, the briefs of amici curiae and arguments of counsel, is of opinion that the said respondents have jurisdiction to determine the validity of the ordinance and proceedings in the case of City of South Norfolk against Norfolk county.

It is therefore considered that the said petition be dismissed, and that the respondents recover of the petitioner their costs by them expended about their defense herein.


Summaries of

City of Norfolk v. Oast

Supreme Court of Virginia
Apr 28, 1949
53 S.E.2d 137 (Va. 1949)
Case details for

City of Norfolk v. Oast

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF NORFOLK v. EDWARD L. OAST, FLOYD E. KELLAM AND J. JORDAN TEMPLE…

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Apr 28, 1949

Citations

53 S.E.2d 137 (Va. 1949)
53 S.E.2d 137