From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Newark v. North Jersey District Water Sup. Comm

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 6, 1969
255 A.2d 193 (N.J. 1969)

Opinion

Argued June 3, 1969 —

Decided June 6, 1969.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, whose opinion is reported at 106 N.J. Super. 88.

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Philip E. Gordon, attorney).

Mr. Oscar R. Wilensky argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Harvey Blicksilver, on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 106 N.J. Super. 88.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

City of Newark v. North Jersey District Water Sup. Comm

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 6, 1969
255 A.2d 193 (N.J. 1969)
Case details for

City of Newark v. North Jersey District Water Sup. Comm

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 6, 1969

Citations

255 A.2d 193 (N.J. 1969)
255 A.2d 193

Citing Cases

Culver v. Insurance Co. of North America

They did neither. Cf. City of Newark v. North Jersey Water SupplyComm'n, 106 N.J. Super. 88, 98-99 (Ch.Div.…

Seitz v. Mark-O-Lite Sign Contractors, Inc.

Any claim by defendant that its obligation of performance should be excused, because to assume the higher…