From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of New York v. Van Schaick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1935
196 N.E. 558 (N.Y. 1935)

Opinion

Argued March 12, 1935

Decided April 16, 1935

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Walter B. Herendeen, Seymour Joseph and Albert D. Levin for appellant.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( John F. Collins, Russell Lord Tarbox and Harry Merwin of counsel), for The City of New York, respondent.

John F. Collins, Russell Lord Tarbox and Harry Merwin for James F. Egan, individually and as Public Administrator, etc., respondent.



Judgments modified by reducing the amount of the recovery to $50,009.22, with interest thereon from March 4, 1933, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.


Summaries of

City of New York v. Van Schaick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1935
196 N.E. 558 (N.Y. 1935)
Case details for

City of New York v. Van Schaick

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE S. VAN SCHAICK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 16, 1935

Citations

196 N.E. 558 (N.Y. 1935)
196 N.E. 558

Citing Cases

Pink v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.

22, with interest. ( City of New York v. Van Schaick, 267 N.Y. 517.) This litigation cost the surety an…