From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of New York v. Off-Streets Parking, Inc.

Supreme Court, Bronx County
Sep 4, 1934
153 Misc. 150 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)

Opinion

September 4, 1934.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel [ Frederick P. Bryan and James E. Nickerson of counsel], for the plaintiff.

Goldfarb Fleece [ Charles L. Fleece of counsel], for the defendant.



The movant seeks an order enjoining the use by the defendant of vacant land as an open air parking space on the ground that such use is prohibited by article 2, sections 2 and 3 of the Building Zone Resolution.

The decisions in this department do not preclude a determination of the issue now presented. (See Matter of Monument Garage Company v. Levy, 241 A.D. 856, affg. 149 Misc. 791; Fassler v. Monument Garage Co., 241 A.D. 856, affg. N.Y.L.J., Special Term, Part I, New York County, Feb. 8, 1934, Mr. Justice McGEEHAN.) These cases, as well as others, involved primarily the issuance of curb cut permits and a definitive ruling on the effect of the zoning law as to the use of unimproved land in a residential zone was not essential to a determination. An affirmance without opinion does not necessarily approve the reasoning of the court below. ( Adrico Realty Corp. v. City of New York, 250 N.Y. 29, 44; Scott Co., Inc., v. Scott, 186 A.D. 518.)

The question, therefore, may be regarded as an original one and open for this court's determination.

In view of the purposes of zoning resolutions ( Euclid v. Ambler Co., 272 U.S. 365), it would seem that by the use of the phrase "building or premises" therein, an intention is evidenced to preempt the entire field of the use of land for business purposes within the prescribed areas, whether such land is vacant or improved. In general the term "premises" is synonymous with "land" ( Matter of Vegenas v. Kelly, 122 Misc. 800; Matter of Cullinan, 113 A.D. 485), and a zoning law to be effective should restrict business activities of any nature within the confines of the residential district. (See People ex rel. Ventres v. Walsh, 121 Misc. 494; Matter of Borgeaud v. Fassler, 153 id. 546; Seidman Sons, Inc., v. Tilrose Camp Operating Co., Inc., Id. 510.)

Motion is granted. Settle order.


Summaries of

City of New York v. Off-Streets Parking, Inc.

Supreme Court, Bronx County
Sep 4, 1934
153 Misc. 150 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)
Case details for

City of New York v. Off-Streets Parking, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. OFF-STREETS PARKING, INC., Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Bronx County

Date published: Sep 4, 1934

Citations

153 Misc. 150 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)
274 N.Y.S. 562

Citing Cases

City of New York v. Off-Streets Parking, Inc.

Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Martin, J., dissents and votes to…