Opinion
February, 1915.
Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. (Hotchkiss, J., dissented.)
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
CITY OF NEW YORK v. DE MARCO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Summaries of
CITY OF NEW YORK v. DE MARCO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for
CITY OF NEW YORK v. DE MARCO
Case Details
Full title:The City of New York, Respondent, v. Celestino De Marco, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Feb 1, 1915
Citations
167 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Citing Cases
City of New York v. De Marco
The court found in favor of the plaintiff in the other action, and adversely to the contractor on all issues…