From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of New York v. Cross Bay Contr. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 19, 1998
250 A.D.2d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Summary

In Cross Bay, we held that where "it appears that the surety has not even completed payment of all valid payment claims, the surety should not be accorded an automatic priority over the claims of Article 3-A trust beneficiaries" (93 N.Y.2d, at 22, supra).

Summary of this case from RLI Insurance v. New York State Department of Labor

Opinion

Decided May 19, 1998

Appeal from the 1st Dept.


LEAVE TO APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEALS GRANTED


Summaries of

City of New York v. Cross Bay Contr. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 19, 1998
250 A.D.2d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

In Cross Bay, we held that where "it appears that the surety has not even completed payment of all valid payment claims, the surety should not be accorded an automatic priority over the claims of Article 3-A trust beneficiaries" (93 N.Y.2d, at 22, supra).

Summary of this case from RLI Insurance v. New York State Department of Labor
Case details for

City of New York v. Cross Bay Contr. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF NEW YORK v. CROSS BAY CONTR. CORP

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 19, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Citing Cases

Kemper Ins. v. State of N.Y

For this reason, in applying federal tax laws, "state law controls in determining the nature of the legal…

RLI Insurance v. New York State Department of Labor

An article 3-A trust commences "when any asset thereof comes into existence" and continues until all trust…