From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of New York v. 60 W. 119 Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 17, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Submitted April 16, 1984

Decided May 17, 1984


Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, this court's decision and order of February 28, 1984 are vacated and the following substituted therefor: "Motion for leave to appeal, pursuant to CPLR 5602 (subd [a], par 1, cl [ii]) dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the ground that defendants have an appeal pending in the Appellate Division from the judgment here sought to be appealed (see Parker v Rogerson, 35 N.Y.2d 751), and upon the further ground that defendants' motion for leave to appeal is untimely because the prior motion for leave to appeal addressed to the Appellate Division was not made within 30 days after service with notice of entry of the judgment sought to be appealed."


Summaries of

City of New York v. 60 W. 119 Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 17, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

City of New York v. 60 W. 119 Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. 60 W. 119 CORP. et al., Appellants, et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 17, 1984

Citations

62 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. 1984)
477 N.Y.S.2d 331
465 N.E.2d 1267

Citing Cases

Parillo v. Salvador

In November 1999, the Court of Appeals denied the motion ( 94 N.Y.2d 754) and defendants perfected this…

Grasso v. Mathew

As a final note and contrary to defendant's argument, this Court was not deprived of jurisdiction by…