From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of New London v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 22, 1992
618 A.2d 528 (Conn. 1992)

Opinion

(14662)

Decided December 22, 1992


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 402 [AC 10307], is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Was the Appellate Court correct in allowing the trial court to substitute its judgment for that of the zoning board of appeals, which held that the city of New London's nonconforming use of its property had been abandoned?

"2. Was the Appellate Court correct in its scope of review of a trial court decision in a zoning appeal by sustaining the trial court decision on an alternative ground, when the trial court itself refused to review the administrative record on the alternate ground?"


Emmet L. Cosgrove, in support of the petition.

Thomas J. Londregan, in opposition.


Summaries of

City of New London v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 22, 1992
618 A.2d 528 (Conn. 1992)
Case details for

City of New London v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF NEW LONDON ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 22, 1992

Citations

618 A.2d 528 (Conn. 1992)
618 A.2d 528

Citing Cases

MENG v. NEW LONDON ZBA

" "A local board is in the most advantageous position to interpret its own regulations and apply them to…