From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Los Angeles v. Abbott

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 18, 1931
114 Cal.App. 756 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 7355.

May 18, 1931.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying motion to tax costs. Joseph P. Sproul, Judge. Affirmed.

Erwin P. Werner, City Attorney, and Arthur Loveland and Arthur W. Nordstrom, Deputies City Attorney, for Appellant.

Culver Nourse for Respondent.


MEMORANDUM CASES.


[1] This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff's motion to tax costs and with two minor exceptions the facts appearing from the transcript are the same as those in City of Los Angeles, Plaintiff, v. Sadie D. Griffith Abbott, Julia Fanta, etc., et al., Respondents (No. 7369), ante, p. 180 [ 299 P. 807], this day decided. The two exceptions are: (1) The motion to tax costs was based upon three grounds only, the fourth ground, that of attorneys' fees being excessive, being omitted in the instant cause, and (2) the motion was not supported by an affidavit such as is found in the Fanta case, supra. The points of law urged by the appellant, however, are identical and this appeal is determined by the opinion therein.

Order affirmed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.


Summaries of

City of Los Angeles v. Abbott

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 18, 1931
114 Cal.App. 756 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

City of Los Angeles v. Abbott

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. SADIE D…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: May 18, 1931

Citations

114 Cal.App. 756 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
299 P. 810