Opinion
2:18-CV-00087-KJM-AC
01-04-2023
CITY OF LINCOLN, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF PLACER; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants, AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
BROWN & WINTERS WILLIAM D. BROWN JEFFREY T. ORRELL JANET MENACHER CHARLES D. GROSENICK RYAN D. DROBEK Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant CITY OF LINCOLN. HARTMAN KING PC JENNIFER HARTMAN KING ALANNA LUNGREN WILLIAM D. MARSH J. R. PARKER ANDREYA WOO NAZAL Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant COUNTY OF PLACER.
BROWN & WINTERS WILLIAM D. BROWN JEFFREY T. ORRELL JANET MENACHER CHARLES D. GROSENICK RYAN D. DROBEK Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant CITY OF LINCOLN.
HARTMAN KING PC JENNIFER HARTMAN KING ALANNA LUNGREN WILLIAM D. MARSH J. R. PARKER ANDREYA WOO NAZAL Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant COUNTY OF PLACER.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE FILING TIME FOR THE CITY OF LINCOLN'S OPPOSITION TO THE COUNTY OF PLACER'S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER AND THE COUNTY OF PLACER'S REPLY
By and through undersigned counsel, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant City of Lincoln (“City”) and Defendant/Counterclaimant County of Placer (“County”) (hereinafter collectively, “Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2022, the City served its First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 66) on the County;
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2022, the County filed its answer to the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 67);
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2022, the City filed its Motion to Strike the County's Second Affirmative Defense within its Answer to the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 68);
WHEREAS, on December 23, 2022, the County filed its Motion to Amend its Answer to the First Amended Complaint (the “Motion to Amend”), concurrently herewith;
WHEREAS, per E. D. Cal. Local Rule 230(c), the City's Opposition to the Motion to Amend would otherwise be due no later than January 6, 2023;
WHEREAS, in recognition of the City's agreement to an extension by two additional days for filing the opposition to any motion to be filed by the City between the date hereof and January 1, 2023, and in recognition of the Christmas and New Year's public holidays, the Parties stipulate to the following extensions of time for filing the opposition and the reply to the County's Motion to Amend.
NOW THEREFORE, the Stipulating Parties hereby stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 144, to the following:
1. The City may file its Opposition to the County's Motion to Amend on or before January 9, 2023.
2. The County may file its Reply to the City's Opposition to the Motion to Amend on or before January 20, 2023.
ORDER TO EXTEND THE FILING TIME FOR THE CITY OF LINCOLN'S OPPOSITION TO COUNTY OF PLACER'S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER AND THE COUNTY OF PLACER'S REPLY
Upon consideration of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant City of Lincoln's (“City”) and Defendant/Counterclaimant County of Placer's (“County”) Stipulation to Extend Time for City of Lincoln to File Opposition to County of Placer's Motion to Amend, and finding good cause therefor, the Court orders:
1. The City may file its Opposition to the County's Motion to Amend on or before January 9, 2023.
2. The County may file its Reply to the City's Opposition to the Motion to Amend on or before January 20, 2023.
3. In light of this new briefing schedule, the motion hearing for the two pending motions, ECF Nos. 68 and 73, set for January 27, 2023 is reset for March 10, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.