From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of L.A. v. Sprint Sols.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 5, 2021
2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC

08-05-2021

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ex rel. RICHARD KNUDSEN, Plaintiffs, v. SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.; NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC., D/B/A NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS AND SPRINT NEXTEL; and DOES 1-10, Defendants.

BAKER & McKENZIE LLP Colin H. Murray Anne M. Kelts WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP John E. Joiner William P. Ashworth, William P. Ashworth Attorneys for Defendants Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Nextel of California, Inc. COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY LLP Niall P. McCarthy Niall P. McCarthy Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Los Angeles


BAKER & McKENZIE LLP Colin H. Murray Anne M. Kelts WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP John E. Joiner William P. Ashworth, William P. Ashworth Attorneys for Defendants Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Nextel of California, Inc.

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY LLP Niall P. McCarthy Niall P. McCarthy Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Los Angeles

STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

WHEREAS Defendants Sprint Solutions, Inc., Nextel of California, Inc., D/B/A Nextel Communications and Sprint Nextel, Plaintiff City of Los Angeles, and Relator Richard Knudsen (together, the Parties) have reached a settlement in principle in the above-captioned case;

WHEREAS, the Parties are in the process of negotiating and executing a final settlement agreement;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that all discovery should be stayed until the Parties execute a final settlement agreement;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that all discovery is stayed until the Parties execute a final settlement agreement. It is further stipulated and agreed that, should the Parties fail to reach a final settlement agreement, the Parties will meet and confer on an amended discovery schedule and will convey their proposed schedule (or competing proposals) to the Court.

ATTESTATION

I, William P. Ashworth, attest that I am one of the attorneys for the Sprint Defendants, and as the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that the authorization and the concurrence in the filing of this document were obtained from its signatories on August 4, 2021.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

City of L.A. v. Sprint Sols.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 5, 2021
2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2021)
Case details for

City of L.A. v. Sprint Sols.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ex rel. RICHARD KNUDSEN, Plaintiffs, v. SPRINT…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 5, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2021)