From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Kan. City v. Crook

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 8, 2015
469 S.W.3d 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

2015-09-8

City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant, v. Edna Crook, et al., Respondent.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, The Honorable Janette K. Rodecap, Judge. Nikola S. Smith, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Edna Crook, Kansas City, MO, respondent pro se.


APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, The Honorable Janette K. Rodecap, Judge.
Nikola S. Smith, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Edna Crook, Kansas City, MO, respondent pro se.
Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges

Order


Per Curiam

Following a bench trial, the circuit court awarded a judgment of $272.24 to the City of Kansas City, Missouri (“City”) on its claim against Edna Crook and Mary Tallman for unpaid water service bills. The City appeals, contending the circuit court erred in failing to award damages covering the full three-year period of the alleged delinquency. The City also contends the court erred in allowing hearsay testimony and documents proffered by Crook and Tallman. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

City of Kan. City v. Crook

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 8, 2015
469 S.W.3d 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

City of Kan. City v. Crook

Case Details

Full title:City of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellant, v. Edna Crook, et al.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Sep 8, 2015

Citations

469 S.W.3d 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)