From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Huntington Woods v. Orchard, Hiltz & McCliment, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 12, 2012
823 N.W.2d 279 (Mich. 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. 145603. COA No. 301987.

2012-12-12

CITY OF HUNTINGTON WOODS, Plaintiff–Appellant/Cross–Appellee, v. ORCHARD, HILTZ & MCCLIMENT, INC., Defendant–Appellee/Cross–Appellant.


Prior report: Mich.App., 2012 WL 1649782.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is therefore moot and is DENIED.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, MARILYN J. KELLY, and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.


Summaries of

City of Huntington Woods v. Orchard, Hiltz & McCliment, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 12, 2012
823 N.W.2d 279 (Mich. 2012)
Case details for

City of Huntington Woods v. Orchard, Hiltz & McCliment, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF HUNTINGTON WOODS, Plaintiff–Appellant/Cross–Appellee, v. ORCHARD…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

823 N.W.2d 279 (Mich. 2012)
493 Mich. 905