From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Hot Springs v. McGeorge Contr. Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas (In Banc)
Nov 15, 1976
543 S.W.2d 475 (Ark. 1976)

Opinion

No. 76-317

Opinion delivered November 15, 1976

APPEAL ERROR — APPELLATE JURISDICTION — TIME WHEN JURISDICTION ATTACHES. — Because the timely filing of a notice of appeal is essential to appellate Jurisdiction, the Supreme Court could not grant relief from a notice of appeal filed the 31st day after entry of an order of dismissal.

Appeal from Garland Circuit Court, Henry M. Britt, Judge; motion for rule on clerk denied.

Eudox Patterson, for appellants.

E. Harley Cox, Jr., of Coleman, Gantt, Ramsey Cox, and Bill S. Clark, of Smith, Williams, Friday, Eldredge Clark, for appellees.


This is an attempt by the city of Hot Springs and its airport commission to appeal from an order of dismissal entered on June 14, 1976. Our clerk refused to file the record, because the notice of appeal was not filed until July 15 — the 31st day after the entry of the order. The appellants argue that the belated filing was excusable, because the order was signed and filed without notice to counsel, and the clerk of the trial court failed to mail a copy to the appellants' attorney, as is the custom of that office.

We cannot grant the relief sought, because the timely filing of a notice of appeal is essential to our jurisdiction. Ward v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 228 Ark. 275, 307 S.W.2d 73 (1957); General Box Co. v. Scurlock, 223 Ark. 967, 271 S.W.2d 40 (1954). We must therefore deny the appellants' motion, without prejudice, however, to an application to the trial court for relief. Cf. Karam v. Halk, 260 Ark. 36, 537 S.W.2d 797 (1976).


Summaries of

City of Hot Springs v. McGeorge Contr. Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas (In Banc)
Nov 15, 1976
543 S.W.2d 475 (Ark. 1976)
Case details for

City of Hot Springs v. McGeorge Contr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CITY of HOT SPRINGS et al v. McGEORGE CONTRACTING COMPANY, Inc. et al

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas (In Banc)

Date published: Nov 15, 1976

Citations

543 S.W.2d 475 (Ark. 1976)
543 S.W.2d 475

Citing Cases

Williams v. Luft Construction Co.

This is not a procedural rule but Is instead a jurisdictional one, and although a person can consent to…

Phillips v. Jacobs

In Davis v. Ralston Purina Co., 248 Ark. 14, 449 S.W.2d 709 (1970), for example, we said that the filing of a…