City of Hays v. Vogt

Full title: CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, PETITIONER v. MATTHEW JACK DWIGHT VOGT

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Date published: May 29, 2018

138 S. Ct. 1683 (2018)

201 L. Ed. 2d 34

Opinion

No. 16–1495.

05-29-2018

CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, Petitioner v. Matthew Jack Dwight VOGT.

David R. Cooper, Lauren Laushman, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith LLP, Topeka, KS, John T. Bird, City Attorney, Glassman, Bird, Brown, & Powell LLP, Hays, KS, Toby J. Heytens, Daniel R. Ortiz, University of Virginia, School of Law, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Charlottesville, VA, for Petitioner. Morgan L. Roach, McCauley & Roach, LLC, Kansas City, MO, Kelsi Brown Corkran, Thomas M. Bondy, Benjamin Chagnon, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Daniel A. Rubens, Alison M. Kilmartin, Haley Jankowski, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

David R. Cooper, Lauren Laushman, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith LLP, Topeka, KS, John T. Bird, City Attorney, Glassman, Bird, Brown, & Powell LLP, Hays, KS, Toby J. Heytens, Daniel R. Ortiz, University of Virginia, School of Law, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Charlottesville, VA, for Petitioner.

Morgan L. Roach, McCauley & Roach, LLC, Kansas City, MO, Kelsi Brown Corkran, Thomas M. Bondy, Benjamin Chagnon, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Daniel A. Rubens, Alison M. Kilmartin, Haley Jankowski, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.