From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Hallandale v. Amato

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 10, 2004
869 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. SC03-2029.

February 10, 2004.

Lower Tribunal No. 4D02-3366.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having determined that it should decline to accept jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Petition for Review is denied.

No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.330(d).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

City of Hallandale v. Amato

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 10, 2004
869 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2004)
Case details for

City of Hallandale v. Amato

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF HALLANDALE, Petitioner(s) v. SAL AMATO, ET UX., Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 10, 2004

Citations

869 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2004)

Citing Cases

Cross v. Pumpco, Inc.

Distefano and Morgan represent examples of knowing deception intended to prevent the defense from discovery…