From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Eastlake v. Sakach

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Lake County
Nov 11, 2003
2003 Ohio 6246 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2003-L-167.

November 11, 2003.

Criminal appeal from the Willoughby Municipal Court, Case No. 03 CRB 02107.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Judson J. Hawkins, City of Eastlake Prosecutor, 33579 Euclid Avenue, Willoughby, OH, 44094 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Katralnada N. Sakach, pro se, 203 Plymouth, Eastlake, OH, 44095 (Appellant).


MEMORANDUM OPINION


{¶ 1} On October 6, 2003, appellant, Katralnada N. Sakach, filed a notice of appeal from a September 2, 2003 judgment of the Willoughby Municipal Court. In that judgment, appellant was found guilty of disorderly conduct and fined $75 plus costs. Thus, appellant's notice of appeal was filed thirty-four days after the judgment had been issued by the trial court.

{¶ 2} App.R. 4(A) states:

{¶ 3} "A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed or, in a civil case, service of the notice of judgment and its entry if service is not made on the party within the three day period in Rule 58(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure."

{¶ 4} App.R. 5(A) provides, in relevant part:

{¶ 5} "(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶ 6} "(a) Criminal proceedings;

{¶ 7} "(b) Delinquency proceedings; and

{¶ 8} "(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings.

{¶ 9} "(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right."

{¶ 10} In the present case, appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R. 4(A) nor sought leave to appeal. Thus, this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is, sua sponte, dismissed pursuant to App.R. 4(A).

{¶ 11} The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

DONALD R. FORD, P.J., and JUDITH A. CHRISTLEY, J., concur.


Summaries of

City of Eastlake v. Sakach

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Lake County
Nov 11, 2003
2003 Ohio 6246 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

City of Eastlake v. Sakach

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF EASTLAKE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KATRALNADA N. SAKACH…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Lake County

Date published: Nov 11, 2003

Citations

2003 Ohio 6246 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)