To the appellee, the certificate is the policy of insurance. National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Griffith, 221 Ala. 112, 127 So. 812. The appellee's declaration on the certificate is in Code form and sufficient. All States L. I. Co. v. Kelso, 29 Ala. App. 310, 195 So. 460; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Gunn, 224 Ala. 444, 140 So. 410; American Bankers' Ins. Co. v. Dean, 227 Ala. 387, 150 So. 333. Where appellant had, under the general issue, the benefit of the facts alleged in its special pleas, error, if any, in sustaining demurrer to special pleas, was without injury. Southern R. Co. v. Freeman, 16 Ala. App. 687, 81 So. 135; City of Cullman v. Laminack, 30 Ala. App. 85, 2 So.2d 314; Montgomery Production Cr. Ass'n v. M. Hohenberg Co., 31 Ala. App. 117, 12 So.2d 865; Cooledge v. Collum, 211 Ala. 203, 100 So. 143. Expert witness cannot give his conclusion on the very issue to be decided by the jury. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Rosebrough, 207 Ala. 538, 93 So. 502; Capital Motor Lines v. Gillette, 235 Ala. 157, 177 So. 881.

Finis E. St. John, of Cullman, for appellee. The complaint is in statutory form and sufficiently describes the land sued for. Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 223(32); Lovelace v. Montgomery E. R. Co., 174 Ala. 154, 56 So. 711; Little v. Thomas, 204 Ala. 66, 85 So. 490; Carroll v. Faucett, 206 Ala. 526, 91 So. 73; Ex parte Craig, 243 Ala. 66, 8 So.2d 411. The description of land contained in pleas 1 to 6 is insufficient. Howard v. Martin, 181 Ala. 613, 62 So. 99; Smith v. Eudy, 216 Ala. 113, 112 So. 640. Defendant is not prejudiced by sustaining of demurrer to plea if he has other pleas under which he could introduce any evidence that would have been admissible under that demurred to. Martin v. Butler, 111 Ala. 422, 20 So. 352; Rhodes Furniture Co. v. Weeden, 108 Ala. 252, 19 So. 318; Marlowe v. Rogers, 102 Ala. 510, 14 So. 790; City of Cullman v. Laminack, 30 Ala. App. 85, 2 So.2d 314; Id., 241 Ala. 203, 2 So.2d 316. An exception in deed which incorrectly describes amount of land excepted from that conveyed by deed is void and title to entire tract passes by deed. Ballentine v. Bradley, 238 Ala. 446, 191 So. 618; Mardis v. Burns, 222 Ala. 31, 130 So. 381; Swindall v. Ford, 184 Ala. 137, 63 So. 651; Bromberg v. Smee, 130 Ala. 601, 30 So. 483; Loyd v. Oates, 143 Ala. 231, 38 So. 1022, 111 Am.St.Rep. 39. Equitable defenses are not available in ejectment and evidence offered to show parties intended something different as to description other than contained in deed, is properly excluded.