From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v. Atkin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1984
472 N.E.2d 1041 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Submitted June 18, 1984

Decided October 23, 1984


Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division dated January 27, 1984 which affirmed so much of the order of Supreme Court dated February 15, 1983 as dismissed the action against defendants Martin, Permanent Savings Bank, Gould, Baynes Construction Company, Inc., Gross, Sherman, Brizdle, Laub Gilfillian, P.C., County of Erie, City of Buffalo and the Buffalo Sewer Authority, denied; motion otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Twenty dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to respondent Atkin.


Summaries of

City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v. Atkin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1984
472 N.E.2d 1041 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v. Atkin

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF BUFFALO URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY, Respondent, v. IDA ATKIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 23, 1984

Citations

472 N.E.2d 1041 (N.Y. 1984)
483 N.Y.S.2d 213
63 N.Y.2d 914