From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Brunswick v. Todd

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 18, 1986
255 Ga. 448 (Ga. 1986)

Summary

In City of Brunswick v. Todd, 255 Ga. 448 (339 S.E.2d 589) (1986), the Supreme Court established that "OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) sets out the proper method of appeal from monetary judgments ranging from one cent to $2,500.

Summary of this case from Dept. of Human Resources v. Prince

Opinion

42561.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 18, 1986.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 175 Ga. App. 562.

Dickey, Whelchel, Brown Readdick, John E. Bumgartner, for appellants. Edward E. Boshears, for appellee.


We granted certiorari in this case to determine the proper application of the monetary "yardstick" found in OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). The Court of Appeals found that the monetary amount placed in controversy by the party seeking damages determines the proper method for seeking appellate review under subsection (a) (6). Todd v. City of Brunswick, 175 Ga. App. 562 ( 334 S.E.2d 1) (1985). We affirm the judgment, but for different reasons.

See Brown v. Assoc. Financial Services Corp., 255 Ga. 458 ( 339 S.E.2d 590) (1986).

OCGA § 5-6-35 provides: "(a) Appeals in the following cases shall be taken as provided by this code section [i.e., by application]: ... (6) Appeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $2,500 or less." "A judgment is the final result of pleadings, evidence and law in the case." Blandford Thornton v. McGehee, 67 Ga. 84, 88 (1881) (emphasis in original). A judgment is not relief sought in a complaint or counterclaim. "Judgment," for the purposes of this code section, relates to the final result of an action for damages.

"Judgment" is modified by "$2,500 or less," OCGA § 5-6-35 (a), and thus applies to actions in which the money judgment is one cent through $2,500. The legislature's intent was to lessen the load on the appellate courts by altering the appeals process in a given class of cases, not to penalize plaintiffs in all cases. We hold that OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) sets out the proper method of appeal from monetary judgments ranging from one cent to $2,500.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED FEBRUARY 18, 1986.


Summaries of

City of Brunswick v. Todd

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 18, 1986
255 Ga. 448 (Ga. 1986)

In City of Brunswick v. Todd, 255 Ga. 448 (339 S.E.2d 589) (1986), the Supreme Court established that "OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) sets out the proper method of appeal from monetary judgments ranging from one cent to $2,500.

Summary of this case from Dept. of Human Resources v. Prince
Case details for

City of Brunswick v. Todd

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF BRUNSWICK et al. v. TODD

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Feb 18, 1986

Citations

255 Ga. 448 (Ga. 1986)
339 S.E.2d 589

Citing Cases

Williams v. Charter Credit Company

The judgment against Williams on the counterclaim requires that we entertain Williams' direct appeal in this…

Whitley v. Bank South, N. A.

The Supreme Court has held that OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) is applicable only where the appellant is seeking to…