From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Brockton v. Grober

Massachusetts Appellate Division, Southern District
Mar 20, 1990
1990 Mass. App. Div. 46 (Mass. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

March 20, 1990.

Present: Hurley Kane, JJ.

Motor Vehicles, Civil Infraction; Finding of responsibility.

Report of court's affirmance of trial court adjudication. Action heard in the Attleboro Division.

Bruce W. Grober, pro se.


This is an appeal pursuant to G.L.c. 90C concerning a civil motor vehicle infraction. Defendant was found responsible by the judge and appealed to this division.

The claim of error raised by the defendant concerns the judge's assessment of conflicting evidence. Where there is a conflict in the evidence it is the duty of the trial judge to resolve the conflicts in arriving at a decision. An appellate division reviews questions of law and cannot review the trial judge's findings of fact. N.B. Lumber Corp. v. Boisvert, 51 Mass. App. Div. 186, 192 (1973). The defendant has not presented an error of law but simply a disagreement with the facts. Commonwealth v. Hawxhurst, 1988 Mass. App. Div. 25.

Although not argued before this Court, defendant in his written claim of error cited the failure to provide a trial by jury. The right to a jury trial does not attach to the adjudication of a civil motor vehicle infraction. Comm. v. Mongardi, 1987 Mass. App. Dec. 106.

There being no error of law, the adjudication is affirmed. The payment of all assessments is suspended for thirty (30) days from the date the clerk gives notice of this opinion to the parties.


Summaries of

City of Brockton v. Grober

Massachusetts Appellate Division, Southern District
Mar 20, 1990
1990 Mass. App. Div. 46 (Mass. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

City of Brockton v. Grober

Case Details

Full title:City of Brockton vs. Bruce W. Grober

Court:Massachusetts Appellate Division, Southern District

Date published: Mar 20, 1990

Citations

1990 Mass. App. Div. 46 (Mass. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Town of Marshfield v. McLaughlin

An appellate division reviews questions of law and cannot review the trial judge's findings of fact. N.B.…