From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Bellmead v. Kluk

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
May 23, 2012
No. 10-12-00122-CV (Tex. App. May. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-12-00122-CV

05-23-2012

CITY OF BELLMEAD, Appellant v. DEVIN KLUK, Appellee


From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-5034-4


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a "Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal," stating that Appellee has nonsuited his claims against Appellant and asking us to dismiss the appeal because there is no longer a matter to prosecute or appeal and to tax costs against the party incurring the cost. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 23, 2012

[CV06]


Summaries of

City of Bellmead v. Kluk

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
May 23, 2012
No. 10-12-00122-CV (Tex. App. May. 23, 2012)
Case details for

City of Bellmead v. Kluk

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF BELLMEAD, Appellant v. DEVIN KLUK, Appellee

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: May 23, 2012

Citations

No. 10-12-00122-CV (Tex. App. May. 23, 2012)