From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Bartlesville v. Bucy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 13, 1914
139 P. 277 (Okla. 1914)

Opinion

No. 5431

Opinion Filed January 13, 1914. Rehearing Denied March 10, 1914.

PAVING ASSESSMENT — Former Opinion Followed. Reversed on authority of City of Bartlesville et al. v. Holm et al., post, 139 P. 273.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge.

Suit in equity by P. L. Bucy against the City of Bartlesville and others to enjoin collection of special assessment. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Reversed and remanded, with directions.

M. D. Libby, for plaintiffs in error.

S. G. Magee, for defendant in error.


The facts and the relief prayed for and granted in the above-styled cause in the court below are identical with City of Bartlesville et al. v. Holm et al., post, 139 P. 273. The causes were consolidated in the court below, and there is a stipulation to the effect that the decision in this cause shall follow the decision in the cause just cited. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment of the court below in the instant case is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to proceed in conformity with the views expressed by this court in the City of Bartlesville et al. v. Holm et al., supra.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

City of Bartlesville v. Bucy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 13, 1914
139 P. 277 (Okla. 1914)
Case details for

City of Bartlesville v. Bucy

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF BARTLESVILLE et al. v. BUCY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 13, 1914

Citations

139 P. 277 (Okla. 1914)
139 P. 277

Citing Cases

City of Muskogee v. Rambo

Provided, that where a majority of the property owners in any block petition the mayor and councilmen for a…

City of Bartlesville et al. v. Revard

KANE, J. The facts in the foregoing case are identical with the facts in the case of the City of Bartlesville…